Author Archive
New York Kumbh Mahayajna 2012 Canceled
Our 2012 New York Kumbh Mahayajna has been canceled by successful New Age entrepreneur Eddie Stern, the lead organizer in New York, and ended our nearly one year of work to bring the gift of Blessings of World Peace and Prosperity when they are so sorely needed.
Comment on Patanjali
Comment on Patanjali
Even a great translation of Patanjali’s definition of yoga doesn’t address some nagging issues. Being arguably among the 2 greatest grammarians of the last 2500 years, and the field of Grammar, Speech, is very sophisticated and wide spread in Indian culture, he composed a SUTRA, a compressed form of Speech, capable of delivering a lot of reference in very few syllables. It is called Yoga Sutra. Other sutras composed during his time and before are unfathomable without commentary. Certainly “Ashtadhyayi,” Panini’s grammar, also in Sutra, had to be redacted in the 16th century, because even the commentary had become too arcane for many students of the time.
Patanjali’s tradition was Speech, and he was one of the greatest masters of it. Yet, we want to read him, as if he was writing as, for example, a 19th century philosopher, presenting his speculations on Truth or God. Although we may assign him to a darshana, or philosophical school, he was not a philosopher, his compositions were not expository, he wasn’t writing non-fiction, he was writing CODE. Not that anything was secret, or he didn’t want others to know – “To the grammarian, to save even a single syllable, was equivalent to the birth of a son (source: shastra stuck inside my head).”
In these sutras and some tantric styles of composition, the references are NOT to ideas, but syllables, and indeed syllables appear where there were none, through decompression, as if we would unzip files on a computer. And the syllables, in turn have references. A master of grammar & composition can send the references in many directions at the same time. Patanjali was such a master.
To extract what looks like a word from The Yoga Sutra, and look it up in Monier-Williams English Sanskrit dictionary, is good for your professor at the university, but just doesn’t cut it among adepts and magi – or yogis. Patanjali is in a class of the greatest esotericists of the last few thousand years.
Yes, we can be inspired by all great literature, make our lives more conscious and happy, and we can do the same with Yoga Sutra. It’s part of its greatness and that of its author.
It’s a lot bigger than it seems. That’s the nature of sutra.
Join the forum discussion on this post
Who owns yoga? Elephant Journal Discussion with Bob Weisenberg
Our most valuable of all yogic assets has been handed over to Mr. McDonald
Lakshmi Ganesh Yantra
Afterwards, give WITH BOTH HANDS the red flower that was placed on the yantra to a special female, wife, mother, daughter, best friend, girlfriend, etc., whether or not she was present during the invocation. At the moment you give it to her, imagine her to be the Mother Goddess Herself.
Guru Purnima II – The Word “Guru” in a Wisdom Tradition
As an archetype, the guru is much more than the Mentor. First and foremost he is Door Guardian, Dwarpal, Darvish, the Sphinx. The Bouncer. One must get past him in order to enter the Extraordinary World.
What are species of Knowledge? Are they in the West?
What are species of Knowledge? Are they in the West?
Interview with Baba Rampuri in PlanetShifter Magazine
When I speak about species of knowledge disappearing, I am using the analogy of species of animals and plants disappearing. Since I tend to see the world in terms of resemblances and reflections, and see all things as interconnected, the greater analogy of species of anything disappearing speaks of our contracting universe. Orwell addressed this in the thirties.
I am not measuring the contracting universe in terms of distances, size of measurable space, but in our perception and knowledge of it. Our Speech is contracting, even our languages are shrinking, which can be measured in our vocabularies.
Until the so-called “Green Revolution” of the 60’s in India, 42,000 folk landraces of rice were known to exist there. Since that time when high yield varieties of rice were introduced and aggressively marketed, agriculture became an industry, and competitive national and international markets matured, more than 95% of these landraces have disappeared and only 23 varieties of rice dominate the entire market. Farmers can no longer afford to grow what their ancestors grew and have abandoned these varieties their families developed over the millennia, adapted to local circumstances and needs. The same is true with many food stuffs in India and around the world.
The historical root of our environmental crisis and our loss of wisdom traditions lies in the European Enlightenment that nurtured a conceptual dichotomy between the Natural World and the Human World. We have detached ourselves from the Natural World and gambled our entire existence on the somewhat fickle ideas and ideologies of man.
Like our extinct (local) folk landraces of rice, our wisdom traditions, our species of knowledge are also local. There are no universal truths, no perennial philosophies, and no ideologies to proselytize. If it’s local, there is no one to convince. Local species of knowledge are well diversified encompassing all areas of human endeavor, and in fact most of our modern technology and pharmacology was plundered from the storehouse of local knowledge.
The authority of the voice of local knowledge was lost to the authority of the mass printed text, the school (so that you could read the mass printed text), then the television, and now the computer screen and mobile telephone. And as we progress through this, our new information (that replaces knowledge) has less and less a connection to the Natural World and more to the fallible ideas of man.
Join the forum discussion on this post
Can you teach ancient ways (Traditional Knowledge?) and heal people via the Internet?
Can you teach ancient ways (Traditional Knowledge?) and heal people via the Internet?
Interview of Baba Rampuri in PlanetShifter Magazine
Personally, I feel that the disadvantages of the computer and Internet for mankind far outweigh the advantages. Nevertheless, it is the reality of our times and in many ways is defining our times, so we have as little choice to adapt to it, and adapt well to it, as we did to post-Gutenberg literacy. In the same way the printing press was the beginning of the end of Oral Tradition, i.e., Traditional Knowledge, the Internet will do the same for Literary Knowledge. Each time this kind of quantum change takes places, there is a contraction of Speech.
The Internet is not the place for traditional knowledge, but for information that very often lacks context. Traditional knowledge requires the sound and authority of a voice and its supporting chorus.
Healing, however, can be done at a distance, and I would imagine that the networking of social media could bring to healers those seeking their help, and possibly heal them. I have done some of this, and recognize that there are many unexploited resources on internet that could work very well.
I think we are going through a major change in Speech right at this moment, parallel with growth of Internet literacy. Twitterspeak, which for most people is a contracted language, can also be used as a compressed language. Patanjali, well known for his Yoga Sutras, composed in a highly compressed style of Sanskrit, millennia before zip files, allowing for decompression by his lineage and wisdom tradition. For others, they must be satisfied with interpretation. More than 2000 years after it was composed, several editions are in the top couple thousand best sellers on Amazon.
To try to do old things with this new medium is missing the point. Despite their loss of meaning, words have suddenly obtained great power for gaining audiences and giving power and authority to their articulators. The power and utility of the internet will continue to grow alongside our new Speech.
Join the forum discussion on this post
How can we produce new mythologies? What are the ingredients?
How can we produce new mythologies? What are the ingredients?
Baba interviewed by Willi Paul at PlanetShifter Magazine
There is a large difference between spinning a narrative, and storytelling. Storytelling exists because it entertains, and when it entertains, it commands an audience. Even Samuel Goldwyn told his screenwriters that if they had a message, then send a telegram (email), it’s a lot cheaper. Storytelling, Mythology is about analogy, which gives a story its entertainment value. The old woman on the edge of the forest didn’t tell her stories because she had a point to make, an ideology to market, she told them because she knew them, and that’s what she did. She didn’t make them up – she found them, in the voice of her grandmother, in the voice of the forest.
Narratives are an attempt to give political context to information, this is not mythology. We call this “The News.” The Authority of this voice comes from its volume and the size of its audience. Narratives use the paradigm of the myth, good guys, bad guys, the quest, bringing balance into the world, the final showdown, and the return home. But where Mythology is connected to the Sky, to the Earth, to the hearts and blood of man, a Narrative is connected to the ideas, ideologies, and strategies of man. Whereas conflicting facts tend to destroy a narrative, they grow a myth. Facts and information are central to the narrative, but have considerably less importance in a myth. Narratives are located in the discourse of a particular place at a particular time, Mythology crosses time and space.
Join the forum discussion on this post
Are you using and/or refining alchemy?
Are you using and/or refining alchemy?
Baba interviewed by Willi Paul at PlanetShifter Magazine
Actually, alchemy is a interesting connection point between East and West, because it gives us an opportunity to consider a different kind of vocabulary when thinking about India, and especially Oral Tradition. Spiritual India is normally represented in the West with a human sciences’ vocabulary of Comparative Religion or Psychology, which gives a very distorted result. But, if we should use the vocabulary of Hermeticism, with it’s focus on connecting with the Natural World, as opposed to mapping things according to the categories of discourse & connecting with only fickle ideas of the time, I find a convenient bridge to allow sharper commentary and interpretation.
I use Indian Alchemy, which I don’t think of as a science, but a knowledge that must be gleaned from Nature and one’s lineage, not on the basis of a rational methodology and discursive reasoning, but through experience, exposure, intimacy, and invocation. So, the task is an ongoing one of knowing oneself and knowing the Natural World, and seeing the mirror reflection between the two; there is no issue of refining Alchemy, as such. That being said, I have been slowly converting to more modern apparatus, and adapting to the technology that is readily available.
Join the forum discussion on this post
How do you define sustainability? Is this a new religion?
How do you define sustainability? Is this a new religion?
Baba interviewed by Willi Paul at PlanetShifter Magazine
Sustainability only becomes an issue when human greed crosses a line, unbalancing the world. We’ve obviously arrived there. I don’t think sustainability is possible until somehow we come to grips with our greatest myth (sic) that consumption makes happiness. As long as that myth is the foundation of our connection to the world and its inhabitants, there will be no sustainability, no matter how sustainable it seems at the time.
There is no sustainability in the ideas and strategies of man, even the dreams of man, but the Natural World which includes man, provides the means to reach the limits of sustainability.
Join the forum discussion on this post
When you think about integration, what are the key tools for human organizing?
When you think about integration, what are the key tools for human organizing?
Baba interviewed by Willi Paul at PlanetShifter Magazine
The easiest way of human organizing is along the lines of ideology, so that one is empowered to protect, defend, and promote what one believes. The weaker the substance of the belief, the stronger the need to defend or promote it. It’s always been very difficult to organize conscious people for this reason.
I think back to May ’68 in France, when the students and workers organized perhaps one of the greatest displays of civil disobedience, stopping the entire country for several days to cause the public to think about some wrongs in society. It was a time of incredible hope for a more conscious future, and a surge of confidence in the power of the people to change things. If we look at those who organized this great event, we discover that many of them are now part of the very bureaucracy they opposed and fought to defeat.
Ideology is the expedient way to organize humans, but is not sustainable. Ideology is fickle, and almost always changes with the times. Let’s not forget that the architects of neo-Imperialism, Irag, Afghanistan, etc., were 60’s radicals. One of Bush’s top speechwriters wrote for one of America’s most radical magazines of the 60’s.
Join the forum discussion on this post




